Comparison of Therapeutic Response and Clinical Outcome between HCV Patients with Normal and Abnormal Alanine Transaminase Levels.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patients with chronic hepatitic C (HCV) infection and normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were considered to have mild disease. In Taiwan, these patients were not suggested for interferon (IFN) based therapies. The aim of study is to compare therapeutic outcomes between HCV patients with normal and elevated ALT levels. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on 3241 HCV patients treated by IFN based therapies. Patients with normal ALT levels were classified as group A (n = 186) while those with elevated ALT levels were group B (n = 3055). RESULTS: At baseline, incidence of diabetes mellitus, low platelet counts and cirrhosis were significantly higher in group B patients. The sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was comparable between the 2 groups (65.3% vs. 65.3%, P = .993). But significantly higher incidence of HCC development after HCV treatment was observed in group B (7.4% vs. 3.2%, P = .032). No significant differences with respect to the outcome of liver decompensation, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and mortality were noted between 2 groups. Multivariate analysis showed younger age, female gender, non-HCV genotype 1, lower viral load, higher platelet counts and non-cirrhosis were favorable factors for achieving SVR, rather than ALT levels. Further analysis revealed older age, cirrhosis, lower platelet levels and non- peg-interferon treatment are risk factors of HCC development. CONCLUSIONS: HCV patients with normal ALT levels had similar response to antiviral therapy and low rate of HCC development after therapy. Antiviral therapies begun at early course of HCV infection may be beneficial to prevent disease progression.

The validation of the 2010 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases guideline for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in an endemic area.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis could be made with one typical imaging study in a cirrhotic liver by the guideline of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) in 2010. Patients with hepatitis B who may not have fully developed cirrhosis could be applied. We aim to retrospectively analyze and validate the diagnostic power of the 2010 guideline in an HCC endemic area (Taiwan). METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2010, a total of 648 patients with liver tumor post-surgical resection were reviewed. The fibrotic scores were verified by METAVIR score 4. Among the 648 patients, 569 (87.8%) were HCC patients. Hepatitis B accounts for 54.5%, hepatitis C 21.9%, hepatitis B + C 2.8%, and non-hepatitis B or C 20.7% of patients. Two hundred eighty-eight of 648 (44%) patients were with cirrhotic liver. RESULTS: The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value, and accuracy of the 2010 AASLD guideline f are 99.1%, 36.7%, 91.9%, 85.3%, and 91.5%, respectively. Cirrhotic liver exhibited a higher PPV (P < 0.001) but lower specificity (P = 0.0479) than non-cirrhotic liver. In both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic condition, no difference existed in patients with hepatitis B or hepatitis C (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Similar sensitivity of HCC diagnosis existed between cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic liver, and across different fibrotic stages. But cirrhotic liver exhibited a higher PPV. Hepatitis B or C has no decisive effect in HCC diagnosis.